ETC

// Hi. // flickr // twitter // random // the background
~ Wednesday, April 25 ~
Permalink
chrisbattleart:

Actual poster from the mid-50’s issued by Senator Joseph McCarthy at the height of the Red Scare and anti communist witch hunt in Washington.  All artists were suspect.

chrisbattleart:

Actual poster from the mid-50’s issued by Senator Joseph McCarthy at the height of the Red Scare and anti communist witch hunt in Washington.  All artists were suspect.


31,195 notes
reblogged via alittlebitofmary
~ Thursday, February 23 ~
Permalink Tags: hahahahaha
1,767 notes
reblogged via photojojo
~ Thursday, February 9 ~
Permalink
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Grizzly Bear - Lullaby


Permalink
sanityscraps:

nogods-nomasters-nopants:

Precisely.

OH GEE, I WONDER WHY WOMEN WON’T DATE ME. BOO FUCKING HOO.

sanityscraps:

nogods-nomasters-nopants:

Precisely.

OH GEE, I WONDER WHY WOMEN WON’T DATE ME. BOO FUCKING HOO.

(Source: existentialist-anarchist)


1,468 notes
reblogged via stfuconservatives
~ Wednesday, February 1 ~
Permalink
youngcaptive:

a giveaway! yay.
i made these patches exclusively for victoire but did one extra to give away here. after this they’ll only be available if you get your butt down to ottawa.
what you win: one 8” x 8” canvas patch digitally printed with my bear illustration.
how you win it: reblog this post and follow me on tumblr. only one entry will be counted per person. i’ll choose a winner by online randomizer on Wednesday, February 8th at noon EST. international entries are welcome.
good luck!

youngcaptive:

a giveaway! yay.

i made these patches exclusively for victoire but did one extra to give away here. after this they’ll only be available if you get your butt down to ottawa.

what you win: one 8” x 8” canvas patch digitally printed with my bear illustration.

how you win it: reblog this post and follow me on tumblr. only one entry will be counted per person. i’ll choose a winner by online randomizer on Wednesday, February 8th at noon EST. international entries are welcome.

good luck!


63 notes
reblogged via oliviamew
~ Saturday, January 28 ~
Permalink

otkaznik:

Só vejo uma resposta, sério: http://www.icj-cij.org/

youranonnewsbrazil:

Depoimentos do #Pinheirinho. Reblog isto e ajude a espalhar. #OpPinheirinho.


10 notes
reblogged via otkaznik
~ Wednesday, January 25 ~
Permalink

Why the friendzone is bullshit and self-proclaimed “nice guys” are misogynists

angels-and-angles:

Why the friendzone is bullshit and self-proclaimed “nice guys” are misogynists

Wow, accidentally deleted my original post. Reblogging so I can keep it in my archives.

——

As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is…

When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she searches for a smarter, richer, and more handsome boyfriend. There is little you can do without feeling like a dick. All in all, one of the meanest things a girl can do, whether they mean it or not.”

and ”The perennial location of nice guys everywhere.”

Although this hypothetical situation could work both ways, friendzone is almost always applied to a man who is rejected by a woman. Therefore, there is something inherently unequal, something inherently sexist about the term “friendzone”. But what and why?

From my experience, this is what friend zone is. A “nice guy” pursues a woman, but isn’t forward with his intentions from the get-go like, say, a “jerk”. The woman is pleased to see a man who is interested in her not as a sexual object but as a human being and wishes for things to stay that way. The man is not satisfied with seeing the woman as a human being because being “expected to support a girl” is a bad deal if she’s not putting out.

Before I delve into the sociological aspects of this, I just want to point out that ”friendzone” is no more pleasant for a woman than it is a man. First, that is to say unrequited love works both ways, but the person who doesn’t return affections is considered mean only when she’s a woman. And second, what option does the woman have in a traditional “friendzone” situation? Just stop talking to a close friend to avoid “leading him on”? In high school, I found out my best friend of 2 years liked me. Having to tell him I didn’t feel the same way and being immediately ex-communicated via Facebook status (“Thanks for wasting my time”) was one of the worst things that ever happened to me. Were our two years of friendship invalid because I didn’t want anything more? Was all our time together really wasted because there was no hypothetical pay off?

Guys who do this and claim to be “nice guys” are the worst misogynists because of their sense of entitlement toward a woman. They make investments in property and expect their dividends. They are fake friends. They are selfish. And they will jump at the chance to vilify you and victimize themselves when their attempts at manipulation don’t work. Clearly, “friendzone” is the remnant of a phenomenon that has plagued women since the beginning of time: women are not independent creatures. Our love lives exist only in the context of a man’s desire. When we make independent decisions, we are subject to a host of derogatory terms. “Slut” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “yes”. “Friendzone” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “no”


13,395 notes
reblogged via pridenotprejudice
~ Tuesday, January 10 ~
Permalink
I think we can all recognize that the “it’s a joke excuse” is the most dismissive, self-righteous loophole, created by those who refuse to examine their power, and assume they have not only the right to say whatever they want to people, but the right to control how other people react to what they have said.

8,250 notes
reblogged via stfuconservatives
~ Tuesday, January 3 ~
Permalink

skelethongs:

“why do gay people have to be everywhere nowadays” said the heterosexual blogger as he sat down in the house owned by his heterosexual parents after a busy day at his primarily heterosexual school learning heterosexual-focused sex education and a syllabus approved by a government mainly made up of heterosexual politicians which enforced policies that generally benefited heterosexuals over people of any other sexuality


6,800 notes
reblogged via stfuconservatives
~ Thursday, December 29 ~
Permalink
Princeton University psychologist Susan Fiske took brain scans of heterosexual men while they looked at sexualised images of women wearing bikinis. She found that the part of their brains that became activated was pre-motor - areas that usually light up when people anticipate using tools. The men were reacting to the images as if the women were objects they were going to act on. Particularly shocking was the discovery that the participants who scored highest on tests of hostile sexism were those most likely to deactivate the part of the brain that considers other people’s intentions (the medial prefrontal cortex) while looking at the pictures. These men were responding to images of the women as if they were non-human.
— The Equality Illusion, Kay Banyard (via bangbangblonde)

704 notes
reblogged via kathrynbegins