ETC

// Hi. // flickr // twitter // random // the background
~ Wednesday, January 25 ~
Permalink

Why the friendzone is bullshit and self-proclaimed “nice guys” are misogynists

angels-and-angles:

Why the friendzone is bullshit and self-proclaimed “nice guys” are misogynists

Wow, accidentally deleted my original post. Reblogging so I can keep it in my archives.

——

As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is…

When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she searches for a smarter, richer, and more handsome boyfriend. There is little you can do without feeling like a dick. All in all, one of the meanest things a girl can do, whether they mean it or not.”

and ”The perennial location of nice guys everywhere.”

Although this hypothetical situation could work both ways, friendzone is almost always applied to a man who is rejected by a woman. Therefore, there is something inherently unequal, something inherently sexist about the term “friendzone”. But what and why?

From my experience, this is what friend zone is. A “nice guy” pursues a woman, but isn’t forward with his intentions from the get-go like, say, a “jerk”. The woman is pleased to see a man who is interested in her not as a sexual object but as a human being and wishes for things to stay that way. The man is not satisfied with seeing the woman as a human being because being “expected to support a girl” is a bad deal if she’s not putting out.

Before I delve into the sociological aspects of this, I just want to point out that ”friendzone” is no more pleasant for a woman than it is a man. First, that is to say unrequited love works both ways, but the person who doesn’t return affections is considered mean only when she’s a woman. And second, what option does the woman have in a traditional “friendzone” situation? Just stop talking to a close friend to avoid “leading him on”? In high school, I found out my best friend of 2 years liked me. Having to tell him I didn’t feel the same way and being immediately ex-communicated via Facebook status (“Thanks for wasting my time”) was one of the worst things that ever happened to me. Were our two years of friendship invalid because I didn’t want anything more? Was all our time together really wasted because there was no hypothetical pay off?

Guys who do this and claim to be “nice guys” are the worst misogynists because of their sense of entitlement toward a woman. They make investments in property and expect their dividends. They are fake friends. They are selfish. And they will jump at the chance to vilify you and victimize themselves when their attempts at manipulation don’t work. Clearly, “friendzone” is the remnant of a phenomenon that has plagued women since the beginning of time: women are not independent creatures. Our love lives exist only in the context of a man’s desire. When we make independent decisions, we are subject to a host of derogatory terms. “Slut” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “yes”. “Friendzone” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “no”


13,324 notes
  1. nourina reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  2. nebulia13 reblogged this from crispyhush and added:
    I agree with some of this. Other parts, though: I have a good friend (whom I adore) who seriously friendzoned a mutual...
  3. afterthenovels reblogged this from crispyhush
  4. crispyhush reblogged this from rommipullo
  5. rommipullo reblogged this from ragemonstr
  6. pleasantlyhallucinating reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  7. bunnymcwabbit reblogged this from blua
  8. studiorecords reblogged this from cluttereddrawers
  9. ragemonstr reblogged this from versaria
  10. roocodendron reblogged this from tokitoide
  11. pandafashionista reblogged this from cluttereddrawers
  12. xkissmyclassx reblogged this from cluttereddrawers
  13. cluttereddrawers reblogged this from atlasaire
  14. playgrounddrama reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  15. dustofretreat reblogged this from versaria
  16. childofnowhere reblogged this from versaria
  17. versaria reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  18. callmelilith reblogged this from jonsneaux
  19. julietsdistress reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  20. atlasaire reblogged this from thehouseholdcat
  21. thehouseholdcat reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  22. starlightfeline reblogged this from tetrozone
  23. umbreon241 reblogged this from tetrozone
  24. morrismaryson reblogged this from josephnewman
  25. thewaterthemountains reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  26. sillysalope reblogged this from angels-and-angles and added:
    I would say “frigid” or “prude” are more universal and accurate but yeah.
reblogged via pridenotprejudice